<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aventures in storage land - damned if you do, damned if you don&#8217;t&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2006/09/07/aventures-in-storage-land-damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2006/09/07/aventures-in-storage-land-damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont/</link>
	<description>by Mark Mayo</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ghosh</title>
		<link>http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2006/09/07/aventures-in-storage-land-damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont/#comment-47783</link>
		<dc:creator>ghosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 04:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2006/09/07/aventures-in-storage-land-damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont/#comment-47783</guid>
		<description>Try running Red Hat GFS for large filesystems (50-60TB in production) or wait for RHEL4.5 - ext3 with 16TB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try running Red Hat GFS for large filesystems (50-60TB in production) or wait for RHEL4.5 - ext3 with 16TB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2006/09/07/aventures-in-storage-land-damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont/#comment-37540</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 21:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2006/09/07/aventures-in-storage-land-damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont/#comment-37540</guid>
		<description>RHEL 3 had JFS support, yeah, but it appears they pulled it out for RHEL 4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RHEL 3 had JFS support, yeah, but it appears they pulled it out for RHEL 4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2006/09/07/aventures-in-storage-land-damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont/#comment-37523</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 18:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2006/09/07/aventures-in-storage-land-damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont/#comment-37523</guid>
		<description>Doesn't RHEL include JFS support? Our lone RHEL box has mkfs, tunefs, etc. for JFS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t RHEL include JFS support? Our lone RHEL box has mkfs, tunefs, etc. for JFS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2006/09/07/aventures-in-storage-land-damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont/#comment-37517</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 16:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2006/09/07/aventures-in-storage-land-damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont/#comment-37517</guid>
		<description>Yeah, SUSE has Reiserfs and XFS, both properly supported.. In general, though, we stick with RHEL/CentOS (or Solaris) and try to keep the environment as consistent as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, SUSE has Reiserfs and XFS, both properly supported.. In general, though, we stick with RHEL/CentOS (or Solaris) and try to keep the environment as consistent as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zdzichu</title>
		<link>http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2006/09/07/aventures-in-storage-land-damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont/#comment-37492</link>
		<dc:creator>zdzichu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 12:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2006/09/07/aventures-in-storage-land-damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont/#comment-37492</guid>
		<description>Oh, and if you really feel the need to go with "enterprise" Linux, Novell's SUSE always promoted Reiserfs, so it is properly supported.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and if you really feel the need to go with &#8220;enterprise&#8221; Linux, Novell&#8217;s SUSE always promoted Reiserfs, so it is properly supported.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zdzichu</title>
		<link>http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2006/09/07/aventures-in-storage-land-damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont/#comment-37467</link>
		<dc:creator>zdzichu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 07:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2006/09/07/aventures-in-storage-land-damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont/#comment-37467</guid>
		<description>There are few more Linux filesystems that support bigger devices. JFS or Reiserfs3. ext3 is pretty old, that's why ext4 is being worked on (http://lwn.net/Articles/190169/). There are also patches floating for lifting ext3 limit to 16TB.  But you won't get them nor ext4 in RHEL for next five years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are few more Linux filesystems that support bigger devices. JFS or Reiserfs3. ext3 is pretty old, that&#8217;s why ext4 is being worked on (http://lwn.net/Articles/190169/). There are also patches floating for lifting ext3 limit to 16TB.  But you won&#8217;t get them nor ext4 in RHEL for next five years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2006/09/07/aventures-in-storage-land-damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont/#comment-37441</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 01:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2006/09/07/aventures-in-storage-land-damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont/#comment-37441</guid>
		<description>Ah, interesting, Fazal. Solaris 10 Update 1 (and beyond, presumably - I believe I was testing with the nevada build that became Update 2) no longer appear to use the "amr" driver for the builtin controller in the v20z. Or perhaps different revisions of the v20z use different versions of the LSI MegaRAID controller?

James: Thx for the correction. "mpt" it is. I've corrected the post. On Linux they've had a few adventures with the mpt driver too, where they ended up splitting the driver into a bunch of different modules to handle the various controllers and hbas available. mptbase, mptscsi, mptsas, mptfc, etc..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, interesting, Fazal. Solaris 10 Update 1 (and beyond, presumably - I believe I was testing with the nevada build that became Update 2) no longer appear to use the &#8220;amr&#8221; driver for the builtin controller in the v20z. Or perhaps different revisions of the v20z use different versions of the LSI MegaRAID controller?</p>
<p>James: Thx for the correction. &#8220;mpt&#8221; it is. I&#8217;ve corrected the post. On Linux they&#8217;ve had a few adventures with the mpt driver too, where they ended up splitting the driver into a bunch of different modules to handle the various controllers and hbas available. mptbase, mptscsi, mptsas, mptfc, etc..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fazal Majid</title>
		<link>http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2006/09/07/aventures-in-storage-land-damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont/#comment-37435</link>
		<dc:creator>Fazal Majid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 00:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2006/09/07/aventures-in-storage-land-damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont/#comment-37435</guid>
		<description>My company has been running a Sun V20z with Solaris 10, the Apple/LSI FC HBA and a XServe RAID as its main internal server for over a year now. We don't boot from the XServe RAID, but there is no conflict with the boot drive and the driver for the FC HBA is itmpt, not ipt.

%pkginfo&#124;grep -i LSI
system      ITImpt                           LSI Logic FusionMPT(tm) drivers
system      SUNWamr                          LSI MegaRAID SCSI HBA Driver</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My company has been running a Sun V20z with Solaris 10, the Apple/LSI FC HBA and a XServe RAID as its main internal server for over a year now. We don&#8217;t boot from the XServe RAID, but there is no conflict with the boot drive and the driver for the FC HBA is itmpt, not ipt.</p>
<p>%pkginfo|grep -i LSI<br />
system      ITImpt                           LSI Logic FusionMPT(tm) drivers<br />
system      SUNWamr                          LSI MegaRAID SCSI HBA Driver</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James C. McPherson</title>
		<link>http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2006/09/07/aventures-in-storage-land-damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont/#comment-37433</link>
		<dc:creator>James C. McPherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 23:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2006/09/07/aventures-in-storage-land-damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-dont/#comment-37433</guid>
		<description>Oh boy, that sounds like a conversation I was involved with a few weeks back. BTW it's the &lt;i&gt;mpt&lt;/i&gt; driver (which I wrote a few bugfixes for last year).

I think it's way past time for you to log an RFE requesting that the mpt driver be updated to include support for LSI's fc hbas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh boy, that sounds like a conversation I was involved with a few weeks back. BTW it&#8217;s the <i>mpt</i> driver (which I wrote a few bugfixes for last year).</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s way past time for you to log an RFE requesting that the mpt driver be updated to include support for LSI&#8217;s fc hbas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

