<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Azul have the next Rails box?</title>
	<link>http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2007/01/09/does-azul-have-the-next-rails-box/</link>
	<description>by Mark Mayo</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 06:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2007/01/09/does-azul-have-the-next-rails-box/#comment-93108</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 21:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2007/01/09/does-azul-have-the-next-rails-box/#comment-93108</guid>
					<description>Irregardless may be nonsensical, but I fall intro the "descriptive" camp when it comes to deciding whether or not words are indeed words, and here in descriptive land irregardless is most definitely a word.

That being said, I should have used "regardless" and avoided the illogical negative prefix...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Irregardless may be nonsensical, but I fall intro the &#8220;descriptive&#8221; camp when it comes to deciding whether or not words are indeed words, and here in descriptive land irregardless is most definitely a word.</p>
<p>That being said, I should have used &#8220;regardless&#8221; and avoided the illogical negative prefix&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dustin Aleksiuk</title>
		<link>http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2007/01/09/does-azul-have-the-next-rails-box/#comment-93102</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 20:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2007/01/09/does-azul-have-the-next-rails-box/#comment-93102</guid>
					<description>"Irregardless" is not a word. Just trying to help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Irregardless&#8221; is not a word. Just trying to help.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ux-admin</title>
		<link>http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2007/01/09/does-azul-have-the-next-rails-box/#comment-51015</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2007/01/09/does-azul-have-the-next-rails-box/#comment-51015</guid>
					<description>Java is simply uninteresting (too complex and often too slow even for the simplest of tasks), so does this thing run Solaris?

What is this "Vega" processor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Java is simply uninteresting (too complex and often too slow even for the simplest of tasks), so does this thing run Solaris?</p>
<p>What is this &#8220;Vega&#8221; processor?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Igor</title>
		<link>http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2007/01/09/does-azul-have-the-next-rails-box/#comment-51011</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2007/01/09/does-azul-have-the-next-rails-box/#comment-51011</guid>
					<description>Looks like a rather niche product to me (for well-heeled and space/power-constrained Wall Street firms etc).
SpecJBB2005 for 16chip/768cores model (not even available until Mar 2007) is about 873K (price rumored to be in the 500K$ range !), but 2CPU/8Core Xeon gives you now about 200K on SpecJBB2005 (price in the 4K$-8K$ range) .
So you'll get ~4.5x more speed for 100x more money.
No amount of saved electricity can cover the difference.
Obviously, single JVM speed (if required) is another matter
and there Azul wins</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a rather niche product to me (for well-heeled and space/power-constrained Wall Street firms etc).<br />
SpecJBB2005 for 16chip/768cores model (not even available until Mar 2007) is about 873K (price rumored to be in the 500K$ range !), but 2CPU/8Core Xeon gives you now about 200K on SpecJBB2005 (price in the 4K$-8K$ range) .<br />
So you&#8217;ll get ~4.5x more speed for 100x more money.<br />
No amount of saved electricity can cover the difference.<br />
Obviously, single JVM speed (if required) is another matter<br />
and there Azul wins
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
