Comments on: New 10.5TB XServe RAID http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2007/01/26/new-105tb-xserve-raid/ by Mark Mayo Wed, 20 Aug 2008 06:11:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: Tom http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2007/01/26/new-105tb-xserve-raid/#comment-56020 Sun, 28 Jan 2007 07:15:44 +0000 http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2007/01/26/new-105tb-xserve-raid/#comment-56020 It is weird that LUN masking is getting pulled from the feature set. Can OSX boot from non zero LUNs? I know many OSes can only boot from LUN0, so you need to use LUN masking to present a different LUN0 to each host. But if OSX does not care, I guess zoning is easier, and probably a little bit faster. It is weird that LUN masking is getting pulled from the feature set.

Can OSX boot from non zero LUNs? I know many OSes can only boot from LUN0, so you need to use LUN masking to present a different LUN0 to each host.

But if OSX does not care, I guess zoning is easier, and probably a little bit faster.

]]> by: Scott Lowe http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2007/01/26/new-105tb-xserve-raid/#comment-55670 Sat, 27 Jan 2007 00:59:09 +0000 http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2007/01/26/new-105tb-xserve-raid/#comment-55670 Mark, If I'm not mistaken, I believe the increased capacity is due to the 750GB drives. See this MacDevCenter article for more information: http://www.oreillynet.com/mac/blog/2007/01/lun_masking_feature_removed_fr.html Scott Mark,

If I’m not mistaken, I believe the increased capacity is due to the 750GB drives. See this MacDevCenter article for more information:

http://www.oreillynet.com/mac/blog/2007/01/lun_masking_feature_removed_fr.html

Scott

]]>